The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)

Permanent Work Force:  889    Temporary Work Force:  22    Total Work Force: 911

Work Force Composition*

Total # Men Women Hispanic or Latino White Black or African American Asian Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander American Indian/ Alaska Native Two or More Races Individuals with Targeted Disabilities
Permanent Work Force

889

55.12%

44.88%

3.60%

78.52%

13.05%

3.26%

0.34%

0.45%

0.79%

0.34%

Major Occupations:
Information Technology Management

27

62.96%

37.04%

7.41%

59.26%

14.81%

18.52%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

3.70%

Miscellaneous Clerk and Assistant

42

14.29%

85.71%

9.52%

47.62%

33.33%

2.38%

2.38%

4.76%

0.00%

0.00%

Credit Union Examiner

677

61.45%

38.55%

2.95%

84.34%

8.42%

2.95%

0.30%

0.30%

0.74%

0.00%

Senior Pay Level*

34

76.47%

23.53%

2.94%

85.29%

5.88%

2.94%

0.00%

0.00%

2.94%

0.00%

First-Level Officials/Managers

0

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Mid-Level Officials/Managers

0

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Senior-Level Officials/Managers

38

73.68%

26.32%

5.26%

81.58%

7.89%

2.63%

0.00%

0.00%

2.63%

0.00%

Unclassified Officials/Managers

92

61.96%

38.04%

5.43%

84.78%

9.78%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

*Includes data for only permanent employees in pay status as of September 30, 2006; does not include pay-banded employees.


Targeted Disabilities

NCUA employed 3 Individuals with Targeted Disabilities in FY 2006, which was 0.33% of its total work force.  This is the same as the number of employees in FY 2005 and a decrease of 4 employees since FY 2002.  The participation rate for FY 2005 was 0.33% and for FY 2002 was 0.76%.  Over the 5-year period NCUA had a net decrease of 0.43% in employees with targeted disabilities.

EEO Complaint Processing

I.  Counseling

NCUA timely processed 100% of the 8 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2006.

II.  Bases of Complaints Filed

The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Race (Black); (2) Age; and (3) Sex (Male).  The 8 complaints filed at NCUA contained 6 allegations of race (Black) discrimination, 1 allegation of race (Asian) discrimination, 1 allegation of color discrimination and no allegations of disability discrimination.

III.  Complaint Processing Times

Of the 4 completed investigations, 100% were timely.  NCUA's average time for completing an investigation was 154 days.  Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Office of Personnel Management had the lowest average of 105 days.

NCUA's average processing time for all complaint closures decreased from 553 days in FY 2005 to 503 days in FY 2006.  The government-wide average was 367 days.

IV.  Costs

NCUA agreed to pay $3,276 for the one pre complaint settlement it reached in FY 2006.  NCUA expended a total of $18,004 for 4 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $4,501.

NCUA agreed to pay a total of $500 for 3 complaint closures through settlement agreements, final agency decisions, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions.  For complaint closures with benefits, the average award was $166.



Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2006

Pre-Complaint Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Pre-Complaint Counselings:

7

1

8

Settlements

0

0%

1

100%

1

12.5%

Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

Complaints Filed*

7

87.5%

Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year

0

0%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2006 where counseling was also completed during FY 2006.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2006

Counseling Complaint**
Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures

8

8

Total Number Offered ADR

8

4

ADR Offer Rate*

100%

50%

ADR Participation Rate*

12.5%

12.5%

Total ADR Settlements

1

0

Total ADR Settlements Amount

$3,276.00

$0.00

*Using newly collected data, EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006.

**Includes all complaints filed in the fiscal year, including those where the counseling was completed in the prior fiscal year.

Timeliness in FY 2006

Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2005 APD* FY 2006 APD % Change
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands)

8

8

100%

All Investigations

4

4

100%

178

154

13.5%

All Complaint Closures

8

553

503

9.0%

Merit Decisions (no AJ)

2

0

0%

382

1,404

268.0%

Dismissal Decisions (no AJ)

3

271

119

56.1%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2006

Complaint Closures Final Agency Decision (no AJ Decision) Final Order (AJ Decision Fully Implemented) Final Order (AJ Decision Not Fully Implemented)
# % # % # % # %
Total Complaints Filed

8

Total Closures

8

Settlements

3

37.5%

Withdrawals

0

0%

Total Final Agency Actions

5

62.5%

5

100%

0

0%

0

0%

Dismissals

3

60%

3

100%

0

0%

0

0%

Merit Decisions

2

40%

2

100%

0

0%

0

0%

Finding Discrimination

0

0%

0

NA%

0

NA%

0

NA%

Finding No Discrimination

2

100%

2

100%

0

0%

0

0%


This page was last modified on June 21, 2007.

Home Return to Home Page