EEOC Seal

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission



Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

Permanent Workforce: 5,040 Temporary Workforce: 1,359 Total Workforce: 6,399

Workforce Composition


Total # Men Women Hispanic or Latino White Black or African American Asian Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander American Indian / Alaska Native Two or More Races Individuals with Targeted Disabilities
Permanent Workforce 5,040 55.81% 44.19% 4.11% 73.00% 17.90% 4.05% 0.08% 0.50% 0.38% 0.63%
Major Occupations:










FINANCIAL INSTITUTION EXAMINING 2,749 64.86% 35.14% 4.04% 80.28% 11.24% 3.46% 0.00% 0.36% 0.62% 0.44%
GENERAL ATTORNEY 376 61.70% 38.30% 3.46% 88.83% 4.26% 2.13% 0.53% 0.27% 0.53% 0.53%
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 333 70.27% 29.73% 4.80% 77.18% 11.71% 4.80% 0.00% 0.30% 1.20% 0.30%
GS-14 and GS-15* 1,181 62.57% 37.43% 2.96% 80.78% 10.75% 4.66% 0.17% 0.59% 0.08% 0.34%
Senior Pay Level* 104 75.96% 24.04% 0.96% 85.58% 10.58% 0.96% 0.00% 0.96% 0.96% 0.00%
First-Level Officials/ Mgrs 4 25.00% 75.00% 0.00% 25.00% 75.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mid-Level Officials/ Mgrs 32 46.88% 53.13% 6.25% 65.63% 28.13% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Senior-Level Officials/ Mgrs 105 76.19% 23.81% 2.86% 81.90% 12.38% 0.95% 0.00% 0.95% 0.95% 0.00%

*Does not include pay-banded employees

Targeted Disabilities

As of September 30, 2009, FDIC employed 45 (0.7%) Individuals with Targeted Disabilities (IWTD). In order to have met the federal 2% participation rate goal, 128 IWTD were needed. This represents an increase of 10 employees over FY 2008 and an increase of 10 employees since FY 2005. The participation rate for FY 2008 was 0.71% and for FY 2005 was 0.76%. Over the 5-year period FDIC had a net decrease of 0.06% in employees with targeted disabilities.

EEO Complaint Processing

I. Counseling

FDIC timely processed 100% of the 22 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2009.

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Age; (2) Reprisal; and (3) Race (Black/African American). Of the 12 complaints filed at FDIC, 3 contained allegations of race (Black/African American) discrimination, 2 contained allegations of race (White) discrimination, 1 contained an allegation of race (Asian) discrimination, 1 contained an allegation of color discrimination and 1 contained an allegation of disability discrimination.

III. Complaint Processing Times

Of the 6 completed investigations, 100% were timely. FDIC's average time for completing an investigation was 194 days. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days.

FDIC's average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 432 days in FY 2008 to 474 days in FY 2009. The government-wide average was 344 days.

IV. Costs

FDIC agreed to pay $2,000 for 4 pre-complaint settlements, of which 1 was a monetary settlement averaging $2,000. FDIC expended a total of $40,304 for 6 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $6,717.

FDIC agreed to pay a total of $11,958 plus other benefits for 5 complaint closures through settlement agreements, final agency decisions, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions. For complaint closures with monetary benefits, the average award was $2,392.

Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2009
Pre-Complaint Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Pre-Complaint Counselings: 13
9
22
Settlements 0 0% 4 44.4% 4 18.2%
Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed 7 53.8% 1 11.1% 8 36.4%
Complaints Filed*



9 40.9%
Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year



1 4.6%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2009 where counseling was also completed during FY 2009.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2009

Counseling Complaint
Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures 22 17
Total Number Offered ADR 18 6
ADR Offer Rate* 81.8% 35.3%
ADR Participation Rate* 40.9% 35.3%
Total ADR Settlements 4 2
Total ADR Settlements Amount $2,000.00 $10,300.00

* EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006.

Timeliness in FY 2009

Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2008 APD* FY 2009 APD % Change
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands) 22 22 100%


All Investigations 6 6 100% 211 194 -8.1%
All Complaint Closures 17

432 474 9.7%
Merit Decisions (no AJ) 3 3 100% 520 474 -8.8%
Dismissal Decisions (no AJ) 0

125 0 -100%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2009

Complaint Closures Final Agency Decision (no AJ Decision) Final Order (AJ Decision Fully Implemented) Final Order (AJ Decision Not Fully Implemented)
# % # % # % # %
Total Complaints Filed 12






Total Closures 17






Settlements 4 23.5%





Withdrawals 2 11.8%





Total Final Agency Actions 11 64.7% 3 27.3% 8 72.7% 0 0%
Dismissals 7 63.6% 0 0% 7 100% 0 0%
Merit Decisions 4 36.4% 3 75% 1 25% 0 0%
Finding Discrimination 1 25% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0%
Finding No Discrimination 3 75% 3 100% 0 0% 0 0%